Friday, 17 October 2014

Performance Evaluation

Yesterday, we performed our final assessment of The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov, a naturalistic piece. I played the role of Petya Trofimov, a student who is known to dress quite poorly but he also symbolises death for Ranevsky because he tutored her son who drowned in a pond. Therefore, every time she sees Petya she is reminded by the death of her son.

Petya was a very interesting character to play because he is not like other characters in the play. He isn't driven by his own desires and greed like Lopakhin or Ranevsky and he has a certain interest in helping people out. Although this is very good of him, he seems to get in the way sometimes and can come across quite strong to others as a bit of a creep. For example, in the scene with Pishchik he wants to help him find his money but ends up just touching him in the most inappropriate places.

My scene as Trofimov consists of him trying to find his galoshes but Lopakhin is pestering him and he is trying to ignore him. Immediately I realised that I had two objectives in this scene and that was 'to search for' and 'to ignore'. This affected how I acted in the scene drastically because it gave me a better understanding on how to instinctually react to things with my objectives in mind.

In the performance I was very good at using the space of the stage. We were told that if we were too close to each other the scene's energy and atmosphere dies out. Therefore, as one of my objectives was 'to search for' it was easy to use the space for me because I would frantically move around the stage looking for his galoshes. Also, one of my main goals this term was to work on my projection and articulation, so when I went into my performance those things were in mind. I feel as if I achieved those goals.

On the other hand, there was a slight mishap at the start of my scene where I forgot to say the second half of my line. Luckily, it was not an important line and that my partner in the scene, Hayden was able to go on with ease. I feel this shows that me and Hayden formed a good working partnership that we were allowed to help each other out so easily and this was shown because it wasn't obvious for the audience I heard.

Ultimately, I believe I gave myself justice during this performance especially considering how hard I worked in rehearsals.

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

Rehearsal 7 - Prep for Performance and Evaluation of group

  • We looked at attitude in our character's voice. This is all down to whether you understood the subtext of the current dialogue which is important. The attitude brings life to the scene and makes it more believable for the audience
  • Stage set up - The stage was set up with a bed in centre stage; a table back stage; two chairs with a cloth over them to give image of a sofa on stage right and behind them is a bench.
  •  It is important to use the stage to the maximum capacity because if the scene is too close together then it dies out and it is easy for the audience to lose interest in the scene
  • Filling in the blanks - doing something while not speaking so it isn't just purely waiting for your cue
  • Carry on your energy - don't lose energy after saying your lines
  • Visualising the scene and setting as your character would because it is easier to act that scene as your character if you're playing them
Today in the rehearsal of The Cherry Orchard, the group worked well to an extent. In my opinion, many people were thinking too much about being natural and it became completely unnatural because of it. People were over thinking about what they were doing making it odd and not right. For most people this was clear and in my opinion, it ruined the scene.

'The Magic If'

The Magic If is a Stanislavskian method which involves the actor putting themselves into their character and giving them a random situation think about what their character would do in this circumstance. This could lead to improvisation and letting the actor indulge in the scene in their character.

Stanislavsky believed that no actor could truly believe in the truth of events however he believed that you can begin to believe in the possibility of those events. He believed that if you create difficult circumstances for yourself, your effort to solve them automatically leads you to natural internal and external reactions.

"All action in the theatre must have an inner justification, logical, coherent and real" - Stanislavski 

Rehearsal 5 - Speaking With Meaning and Passion

The most important method learned today was to speak with meaning and passion within your voice. We learned that if you have no meaning and passion within your voice then you might as well not be on the stage because you wouldn't be portraying your character. We learned that it is important to not fade away the end of your lines and that you must keep your lines strong even when your not speaking so the other actors can react to the effect of the words your character just said.

For example, Chloe's scene has been difficult for her because she struggles to show true passion behind her lines when she speaks and she often fades away her lines when she's speaking; because of this, the scene lacked honesty making the scene very unconvincing. She fixed these errors and did it again and the atmosphere changed in the scene drastically because her lines had more grit, power and honesty behind them.

Rehearsal 4 - Objective Work and Evaluation

Today we looked at extensively looking at how we could portray our objectives well enough that the audience can understand but not to the point where it is no longer naturalistic and more melodramatic. My objective for my scene was to search for and ignore, in my opinion these are two very easy objectives to fulfill. This is not me implying that my character was not a challenge but it is because I studied him well and it was easy for me to grasp his objectives and bring them down to a simpler form. I could see that many people had over complicated their objectives which made it difficult for them to portray it when we asked to mime it. For example, Skye's objective was 'to remember', because this is quite a difficult objective to act it took the whole lesson for him to grasp it. Will made the whole class try and portray to remember and it was important that it was instinctual. I asked if I could show my version of too remember, and it was 50/50 from the class. One half, including Will, believed I was playing 'to remember' but the other half just thought I was a madman. I could understand why but I still thought I played it well. Anyway, my objectives were clearly shown and I do believe that.

I believe that today, I played the role of Trofimov well because I had established my objectives early so it was easier for me to play the role. In my opinion, I felt as if I worked well and managed to stay focused. The play is difficult for me, I feel, so it was tricky trying to keep positive but I managed to.

Rehearsal 3 - Objectives and the Context of a scene

This lesson was one of our most important lessons yet and that was using the Stanislavskian methods of Objectives, Given Circumstances and Circles of Attention. These methods are important for us as actors because they help us develop our scene and characters because they help us understand the context.

Given Circumstances:

  • Facts and opinions about your character
  • Who are you? What are you doing? Why are you doing it?
  • What time is it? What's the date? Where are you?
  • What just happened to your character behind the scenes? It could have been just now or something from long ago that affects him up to now.
  • Where do you live
  • Who you are related to 
To accomplish all of these points is to look through the whole script and research the context of the play as well, and that is the only way. It is important to know everything about your character in your performance because anything that happens to your character should affect how you act as them. For example if the whole play your character is quiet and doesn't say much, but at the end he kills someone, you as an actor need to be able to show signs that aren't obvious throughout the play that your character is capable of murder.

Objectives:

  • Super objective - the characters task that spans the whole play. What are they after or need? Are they running away from something? Are they persuading? etc
  • Objective -  the character's task in the scene. What are they trying to achieve in that scene
 These two types of objectives cannot be obtained if you don't act towards your given circumstances. The objective of your character is probably the most important thing as an actor, especially in naturalistic plays. The character must have a reason to be there or it doesn't look natural. It is like in real life and you're in a room. You have an objective whilst you sit in that room. You may not want to be there so you might want to leave and that's your objective, just like in a performance, if you show no real reason to be there you might as well be off the stage.

Circles of attention:




=  Public




                                   Private   =                             




= Personal 
 
 
Circles of attention can not be achieved without the first two methods, in my opinion. You cannot know which circle to be in if you don't know the given circumstance or the character's objective. It is important that once you've established them you can.
 

Rehearsal 2 - How to breathe

In today's lesson we learned how to breathe. We learned that irregular breathing will cause irregular sentences which doesn't look or sound right, so it is important for an actor to look through their lines and find where it is correct to breathe. We looked through each sentence in our lines specifically and when we found the correct place to take a short breath we would note it on our script with a single forward slash like this (/). When it was acceptable for your character to have a longer breath we would put a double slash like this (//). As well as being able to breath, these marks also show that the character may have a different thought and this could lead to him saying the next line in a different tone of voice or the transition of your body's posture.

All though this was all very important, this whole excercise was good for us to be able to really understand our characters. It made us think like our characters and really get into their heads. I think this was good for us as actors because it made the role easier to play, especially due to the fact that none of these characters are that relatable  to our generation.